| EPSRC Reference: |
EP/F003897/1 |
| Title: |
Subgroups and spines of mapping class groups |
| Principal Investigator: |
Anderson, Dr J |
| Other Investigators: |
|
| Researcher Co-Investigators: |
|
| Project Partners: |
|
| Department: |
School of Mathematics |
| Organisation: |
University of Southampton |
| Scheme: |
Standard Research |
| Starts: |
01 June 2007 |
Ends: |
31 December 2007 |
Value (£): |
14,328
|
| EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: |
| Algebra & Geometry |
Mathematical Analysis |
|
| EPSRC Industrial Sector Classifications: |
| No relevance to Underpinning Sectors |
|
|
| Related Grants: |
|
| Panel History: |
|
|
Summary on Grant Application Form |
|
Mathematics is the study of pattern, and one of the things mathematicians attempt to do is to understand the patterns inherent in objects. This allows us to collect together objects that have similar behaviour, and also to distinguish them from collections of objects whose behaviour is in some way significantly different. In attempting categorize objects in this way, we sometimes find objects that don't fit well into the categories we have chosen. One such object that doesn't fit well is the mapping class group of a surface, which is what makes the study of the mapping class group interesting and valuable. On the one hand, it behaves like a class of objects known as 'Kleinian groups', in that they share some basic structural similarities. On the other hand, it behaves very differently from Kleinian groups, and shares some behaviours with another class of objects known as 'lattices in higher rank Lie groups'.The basic purpose of this research is two-fold. One objective is to understand the inner workings of the mapping class group by trying to build a smaller object that contains all the necessary information to classify it. Such an object is called a 'spine'. This is a polyhedral object, and as such its best possible 'size' (or dimension) is calculable. However, the known constructions of spines for the mapping class group produce spines that are too big, in that their dimension is larger than the theoretically best possible dimension. We will construct an appropriately sized spine for the mapping class group, so that we can have a better geometric handle with which to study the mapping class group.The second objective is to explore in more detail the similarities between the mapping class group and Kleinian groups. We have a particular analogy in mind here. It is a consequence of the Ahlfors Finiteness Theorem and work of Thurston that a Kleinian group has a very restricted set of subgroups, specifically its 'finitely generated normal subgroups'. We will show that the mapping class group has a similarly restricted set of 'finitely generated normal subgroups', so that in this way it shares a structural similarity to Kleinian groups.
|
|
Key Findings |
|
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk
|
|
Potential use in non-academic contexts |
|
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk
|
|
Impacts |
|
| Description |
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk |
| Summary |
|
| Date Materialised |
|
|
|
|
Sectors submitted by the Researcher |
|
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk
|
| Project URL: |
|
| Further Information: |
|
| Organisation Website: |
http://www.soton.ac.uk |